tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2051479332227534348.post6266871533337122812..comments2008-03-21T16:01:42.971-04:00AnnBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01984221266439604010noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2051479332227534348.post-15683789590008012008-03-21T16:01:00.000-04:002008-03-21T16:01:00.000-04:00Thank you.<BR/><BR/>I can't for the life of me figure out why (almost) no one ever makes this point about About.com.<BR/><BR/>It seems kind of important.DogLady (AB.com)http://www.blogger.com/profile/10367547231964009662noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2051479332227534348.post-55548614269088006232008-03-19T22:59:00.000-04:002008-03-19T22:59:00.000-04:00About.com's so-called 'content' is not only mediocre, it's bad for the vast majority. Most if not all of the editors won't reply to emails (they left, that's why), the articles haven't been updated from the initial day they were written... it's bad, bad, bad.<BR/><BR/>It occurred to me they were an MFA operation a while back and I'm glad I'm not the only one with that thought. <BR/><BR/>In any case, first visit to your blog, very impressed so far :)Stephan Tualhttp://www.terapad.com/noreply@blogger.com